AML Framework Review Active
Section-by-section review of Client M's AML Framework against FATF Recommendation 10 and JYG's internal standard. Used for the upcoming 28 June refresh and any follow-up advisory work.
Gap analysis vs FATF Rec. 10
Three material gaps on beneficial ownership: 25%-threshold cascade, senior managing official fallback, source-of-funds for PEP-related BOs…
Draft revised Section 4.2
Section 4.2.1 (identification cascade), 4.2.2 (verification standards), 4.2.3 (source of funds for PEP-related ownership) — draft ready for review…
Beneficial owner verification flow
Walk-through of the verification steps for BO documentation: reliable source documents, completion before business relationship, exceptions under FATF Rec. 10 §15…
Client communications wording
Draft email language for explaining the policy update to Client M's compliance officer. Tone: collaborative, sectioned, explicit about deadlines…
ClientM_AML_Policy_v3.pdf
FATF_Recs_Feb2026.pdf
JYG_Internal_AML_Standard.docx
Custom instructions for this project
Every chat in this project starts with these instructions. The AI follows them automatically — you don't need to repeat yourself.
Add relevant context
Upload documents, paste text, or import from Box or Outlook. The AI will reference them in every chat in this project.
Memory
Only youWhat the AI has learned from your chats in this project. Editable.
- Andy prefers section-numbered citations (FATF Rec. 10 §B style)
- Client M's AML refresh deadline: 28 June 2026
- JYG_Internal_AML_Standard.docx is the authoritative reference
- Drafts should match Client M's existing tone (formal, sectioned)
Sources
3 filesClientM_AML_Policy_v3.pdf
28 pages
FATF_Recs_Feb2026.pdf
142 pages
JYG_Internal_AML_Standard.docx
34 pages